Enter at Own Risk by Revocable License

Recently I noticed this sign on a sidewalk. It reads “Private Property: Enter at Your Own Risk by Revocable License.” Presumably it marks the border between the public domain of the sidewalk and the privately owned area of storefronts and apartment complexes right beside it. I found it interesting, though, that the owners feel the need to have that sign there. I’ve never seen anything like it on a sidewalk. Clearly the proprietors want to cover as many bases as they can, lest someone trip and fall on the wrong side of the line and then look for someone else to blame.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Options Trading Approval with Student Loans

Recently I applied for options trading approval with my online broker. Since I have student loans, my application was not approved, but I was given permission to write covered calls. I suppose that was a consolation: Covered call writing is one of the least risky plays that can be made with options. The position entails receiving a one-time payment in exchange for giving up all gains from the stock that go above the strike price of the call option. Those would go to whomever the call option was sold to.

A covered call position makes the most sense for a stock that has little potential to move up (because all gains above the strike price will be lost), but also little potential to move down (because the holder still bears that risk by owning the stock.) Taking the position on a stock with higher volatility tends to provide a higher initial payment, but also a higher likelihood of losses.

If you have a large amount of student loans, don’t expect to be approved for full options trading. Options trading, much like leverage, offers the potential for massive profits, but also massive losses. Although I would have been responsible with my account had it been approved for options trading, I do acknowledge that the potential harm by poorly chosen trades with options could be disastrous for a person with very little disposable income.

Posted in Finance | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thunderstorm Log from Ithaca, NY

Thunderstorm in Ithaca, NY 2012_05_03
Some In-Cloud Lightning to the West of Ithaca

The thunderstorm today featured marble-sized hail and frequent cloud-to-cloud lightning, along with lesser amounts of cloud-to-ground lightning. On the weather radar it appeared to be a small but concentrated storm. It’s likely that the thunderstorm activity will continue throughout the night at varying levels of intensity.

Posted in Random | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Office: “Angry Andy”

Last Thursday’s episode of “The Office” focused on Andy’s struggle with Nellie (Catherine Tate), a new character who decided to commandeer the manager’s position in Andy’s absence. Although a ridiculous proposition in real life, the CEO in The Office allowed this to happen because apparently he’s attracted to Nellie. None of the characters know this for sure, of course, although I’m sure some of them suspect it. The CEO “Robert California” (James Spader) was initially presented as a powerful and eccentric character, but lately he’s just been eccentric in his complicity with Nellie’s hostile takeover of Andy’s job.

Not willing to take this, Andy snapped and punched the same wall that he seemed to have something against in an earlier season. After (quite understandably) refusing to acknowledge his inexplicable demotion to the sales team, he ultimately got fired after saying “no” a few too many times to Robert California. Of course, Nellie was able to say “no” to the man as much as she wanted to. Thus the episode concluded as a fine example of what The Office is famous for: presenting office politics in an exaggerated light for us to laugh at and reflect upon.

In that light, I like to think about how situations in The Office would play out in real life. Obviously Andy overreacted and should not have expressed his anger how he did. His hot temper is a character trait that the show has developed. However, Andy was dealt a serious injustice, since he was a competent manager, and there was no reason for him to have lost his job the way he did. I couldn’t imagine him working at Dunder Mifflin under the very person who displaced him. Talk about a hostile work environment.

Time will tell what actually happens. This situation seems very similar to the time when Michael Scott quit and decided to start his own paper company back in season 5. Maybe Andy has a few business ideas of his own, although he’s not nearly as much of a risk taker as Michael Scott was.

Posted in Random | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Using “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

A common issue found in a lot of writing is the tendency to see “they” used as a pronoun for a singular object. It’s hard to write without that being the case, actually, because it sounds right. Here’s an example:

If a person wants to earn a lot of money, they will have to work very hard.

The grammatical error in that sentence is that “they” is referring to “a person”, but “they” is a plural pronoun while “a person” is singular. Yet I think it sounds right. Said aloud in a conversation, few people would think twice after hearing that phrase. This begs the question, though: if the sentence above is gramatically incorrect, how should it be reworded to mean the same thing? One possibility is to use “he or she”, as in:

If a person wants to make a lot of money, he or she will have to work very hard.

The problem with that is it’s wordy, and using just “he” or just “she” could come across as anachronistic, or even sexist. Another alternative is to turn the object of the sentence into its plural form, but that doesn’t always work. For example:

It people want to make a lot of money, they will have to work very hard.

That is correct, I believe, but it doesn’t mean the same thing as the original statement did. Sometimes it works well enough, as in:

If a student wants to succeed, they will have to study often.

Versus:

 If students want to succeed, they will have to study often.

If precise grammatical correctness isn’t a big deal, though, then in most cases the best option is to just use “they” as a singular pronoun. It’s accepted in speech in all but the most prudish of environments. It’s probably only a matter of time before it becomes acceptable grammatically too.

Linguistics will tell you that the writing and correct forms of a language always trail behind the actual usage of a language. Put in other terms, the popular forms of words tend to become the correct form of words, given enough time and enough usage. Although that doesn’t always happen. Look at Latin: historians believe the spoken (or “vulgar”) form of Latin was miles apart from the more erudite written form in the A.D. era. Then again, literacy was much less common in those days too!

The source for most of this post is: http://oxforddictionaries.com/words/he-or-she-versus-they

Posted in Academic | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Abstruse Goose Explained: Reading in Bed

http://abstrusegoose.com/454

This work expresses the frustration that a literate person feels coming across a new word while comfortably reading a book. On the one hand, one does not want to leave the comfort of the bed or the couch to find a dictionary. On the other hand, if readers value their personal enrichment, not to mention the ability to actually understand what is being read, they’ll want to look up the word.

A possible response to this dilemma is to have a smartphone or tablet nearby in your comfortable and cozy position. Having a good dictionary on there means that the definition of “amanuensis” is about a dozen taps away.

The author of this work is suggesting that, in this scenario, he usually presses on, continuing to read the book ignoring the undefined parts. This is probably false, because the author comes across as a very educated person through most of his comics. Besides, how would he know what an amanuensis is without having looked it up?

The definition of amanuensis is: “one employed to write from dictation or to copy manuscript.” Source: Webster’s dictionary.

Posted in Abstruse Goose Explained | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Five S as seen at Shaw’s Supermarket appears in Lecture

ORIE 3120 Lecture Slides on 5S (Five S)

Sort, Set, Shine, Standardize, Sustain

It’s always neat to come across something in a class that’s actually being used in real life. I remember being asked to remember what each of the five S’s stood for when I was working at Shaw’s. Now I have to remember what they mean for ORIE 3120. It’s a small world.

5S was developed primarily by Hiroyuki Hirano in Japan in the 1980s. It was originally a part of the Just In Time production methodology, in the context of automobile manufacturing. That’s because well maintained workstations help allow production to occur whenever it is needed.

Posted in Random | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How fast does the guy in Temple Run run?

It takes about 16 seconds to run the first 250 meters in the Temple Run app on the iPhone. That means the guy (“Guy Dangerous”, default character) runs about 35 miles per hour, which is about 56 kilometers per hour. Wow, that’s a fast runner! I always thought it felt unnaturally fast. Of course, the scary monkeys coming up from behind him serve as some pretty severe motivation!

Source: Temple Run App for iPhone, by By Imangi Studios, LLC

Source: Temple Run App for iPhone, by By Imangi Studios, LLC

Posted in Software | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

4G Indicator on AT&T iPhone 4S with iOS 5.1

Nope, there is no LTE hardware in the iPhone 4S, even though it looks as though iOS 5.1 suddenly unleashed it. However, the HSPA+ technology that the 4S has always had can be considered 4G according to the organization that determines these standards. The new iPad, however, does have LTE 4G capability. This means that the next iPhone will probably have it as well.

I kind-of like it that it now says “4G”, even though it doesn’t really matter.
iPhone 4S Home Screen with 4G Indicator

Posted in Technology | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What is the ✆ Symbol in Gmail?

The ✆ symbol may appear next to a sender’s name in Gmail, particularly if the account has the Sender Time Zone lab feature enabled. If the icon is red, then that is supposed to indicate that it’s not a good time to make a business-related phone call to the user. The Web app figures this out based on the user’s default time zone, but I don’t know what times the app actually considers to be acceptable. The ✆ symbol itself appears to be an icon of an old-style phone with a circle behind it, and apparently it’s a symbol character in some fonts.

A preview of the setting for the Gmail Sender Time Zone Labs feature, with the ✆ symbol depicted as an preview of how the app works. Source: Gmail.

 

Posted in Software | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment